500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 68 CAMBRIDGE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

39

48%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

31

55%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

83

30%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

74

27%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.