500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

HERRICKS UFSD

Special Education School District Data Profile 2023-24

The Special Education School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and purposes of the implementation of IDEA.

The SPP is a six-year plan which describes New York State's performance on 17 indicators. States must report annually to the public on the performance of the State in an Annual Performance Report (APR) and each school district against the State's targets. New York State's SPP and the APR that describe these indicators in detail are available at .
The following report reflects only quantifiable data collected by the State. Since performance of a school district in any indicator may be the result of unique circumstances within a district, readers are encouraged to consider information provided by the district's administration in interpreting these data.


Enrollment and Classification Rate

District Enrollment: 4,907
School-Age Students with Disabilities and Classification Rate

525

10.7%

Preschool Students with Disabilities

44

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate of Students with Disabilities

2022-23 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

36

91.67%

State Target

Target Met

73% or higher

Yes, met state target

† Data for indicator 1 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rate of Students with Disabilities

2022-23 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Drop Out rate

36

0%

State Target

Target Met

19% or lower

Yes, met state target

† Data for indicator 2 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 3: State Assessments

(Note: Data are suppressed when fewer than 5 students with disabilities are enrolled in a district.)

A. Participation rate for students with disabilities

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

38

84.21%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

34

70.59%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

32

100%

State Target

Target Met

95%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

38

84.21%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

34

73.53%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

32

93.75%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

B. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

27

22.22%

State Target

Target Met

15.50%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

21

38.10%

State Target

Target Met

13.75%

Yes, meets state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

28

85.71%

State Target

Target Met

72.50%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

27

37.04%

State Target

Target Met

18.75%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

22

59.09%

State Target

Target Met

11%

Yes, meets state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

26

73.08%

State Target

Target Met

64.75%

Yes, meets state target

C. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against alternate academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

89.75%

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

82%

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

74%

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

82%

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

76%

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

77.25%

D. Gap in proficiency rates for students with disabilities and for all students against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

294

82.31%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

27

22.22%

Proficiency Gap

60.09%

State Target

Target Met

31.50%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

341

83.28%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

21

38.10%

Proficiency Gap

45.19%

State Target

Target Met

33.50%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

All students and proficiency rate

363

98.62%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

28

85.71%

Proficiency Gap

12.91%

State Target

Target Met

20.75%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 4 Math

All students and proficiency rate

297

90.57%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

27

37.04%

Proficiency Gap

53.54%

State Target

Target Met

30.75%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

All students and proficiency rate

350

92.57%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

22

59.09%

Proficiency Gap

33.48%

State Target

Target Met

34.25%

Yes, meets state target

High School Math

All students and proficiency rate

355

93.80%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

26

73.08%

Proficiency Gap

20.73%

State Target

Target Met

26.50%

Yes, meets state target

Indicator 4A: Suspension Rate

(based on 2022-23 school year data)

Students with Disabilities: 502
Suspension Rate 2023-24

Students with Disabilities Suspended Out-of-School for More than 10 Days and Percentage

0

0%

State Threshold

Threshold Met

2.7% or lower

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 4B: Significant Discrepancy by Race and Ethnicity in Suspension Rate

(based on 2022-23 school year data)

Suspension Rate 2023-24

Did the school district have significant discrepancy?

No

State threshold for 2023-24

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 5: School-age Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilities ages 5 in kindergarten to 21: 520
Students with 80% or more of the day in a general education program

58.1%

State Target

Target Met

Greater than or equal to 59%

No, did not meet state target

Students with Less than 40% of the day in a general education program

17.3%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 17.5%

Yes, met state target

  Students with disabilities in separate settings

4.6%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 4.9%

Yes, met state target

Indicator 6: Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilites ages 3 and 4 and 5 not in kindergarten: 49
Students with disabilities with measurement A

26.5%

State Target

Target Met

45% or higher

No, did not meet state target

Students with disabilities with measurement B

28.6%

State Target

Target Met

25.0% or lower

No, did not meet state target

Students with disabilities with measurement C

6.1%

State Target

Target Met

10.0% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 7 for 2023-24 please see for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 8: Parental Involvement

This district is not required to report for indicator 8 for 2023-24 please see for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Identification for Special Education

Disproportionate representation in special education?

Yes-SD

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

No, did not meet state threshold

Indicator 10A: Disproportionality in Specific Disability Categories

Disproportionate representation in specific disability categories?

Yes-SD

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

No, did not meet state threshold

Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations (Child Find)

Number of preschool students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received (July 1, 2023to June 30, 2024)

25

Number of preschool students whose evaluations were completed within the State established timeline

14

Number of preschool students whose evaluations were not completed within State established time lines, but for reasons that are considered to be in compliance with State requirements

0

Compliance Rate

56%

State Target

Target Met

100%

No, did not meet state target

Number of School-Age students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received (July 1, 2023to June 30, 2024)

51

Number of School-Age students whose evaluations were completed within the State established timeline

49

Number of School-Age students whose evaluations were not completed within State established time lines, but for reasons that are considered to be in compliance with State requirements

0

Compliance Rate

100%

State Target

Target Met

100%

Yes, met state target

Number of Combined students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received (July 1, 2023to June 30, 2024)

76

Number of Combined students whose evaluations were completed within the State established timeline

63

Number of Combined students whose evaluations were not completed within State established time lines, but for reasons that are considered to be in compliance with State requirements

0

Compliance Rate

85.1%

State Target

Target Met

100%

No, did not meet state target

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays consistent with State law.
Number of children who were served in Part C and referred to Part B for eligibility determination)

8

Number of those referred determined to be NOT eligible and whose eligibilities were determined prior to their third birthday

0

Number of those found eligible who had an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday

2

Number of children for whom delays in determination of eligibility or delays in implementing the IEP were caused by reasons that are in "in compliance" with State requirements

0

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays.

25%

State Target

Target Met

100%

No, did not meet state target

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

This district is not required to report for Indicator13 for 2023-24 please see for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 14 for 2023-24 please see for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.
Top