500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

30TH AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

203

76%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

243

74%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

125

86%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

139

81%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

78

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

104

67%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

18

90%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

127
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

103

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

153
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

117

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

61

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

73

76%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

10

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

14

67%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

21

64%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

202

78%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

239

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

143

76%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

178

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

60

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

65

68%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

311
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

3%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

239

74%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.