500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS - BRONX 4 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

80

86%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

179

84%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

38

84%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

94

81%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

42

88%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

85

87%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

38

79%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

105
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

86

81%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

37

95%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

85

86%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

73

92%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

148

88%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

31

69%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

20

95%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

34

81%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

60

83%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

145

84%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.