500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EAST ELMHURST COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

58

42%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

34

46%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

21

20%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

37

36%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

48

41%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

56

50%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

13

54%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

41

48%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

60

45%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

22

43%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

56

43%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

48

42%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.