500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-UNION SQUARE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

130

43%

LEVEL 4

150

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

406
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

6%

LEVEL 3

173

40%

LEVEL 4

233

54%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

54

37%

LEVEL 4

82

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

129

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

76

50%

LEVEL 4

68

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

90

43%

LEVEL 4

104

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

8

73%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

16

76%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

30

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

43

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

30

35%

LEVEL 4

52

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

67

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

33

53%

LEVEL 4

26

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

41

43%

LEVEL 4

45

47%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

39

47%

LEVEL 4

32

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

63

48%

LEVEL 4

58

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

92

40%

LEVEL 4

132

58%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

219

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

56
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

38

54%

LEVEL 4

18

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

72
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

58

66%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

401
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

6%

LEVEL 3

169

39%

LEVEL 4

232

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

107

62%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

154

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

66

52%

LEVEL 4

43

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

102

52%

LEVEL 4

79

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

267
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

5%

LEVEL 3

122

43%

LEVEL 4

145

51%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.