500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PELHAM GARDENS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

233

52%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

203

44%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

115

51%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

95

44%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

118

52%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

147

53%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

118

46%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

65

50%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

69

45%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

149

43%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

131

36%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

84

79%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

72

72%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

207

50%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

180

42%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

26

74%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

23

59%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

48

45%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

37

35%

LEVEL 2

47

44%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

185

53%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

166

46%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

212

51%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

188

44%

LEVEL 2

144

34%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.