500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

162

61%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

228

59%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

25

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

78

62%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

110

60%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

84

60%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

118

58%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

52

63%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

74

58%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

89

60%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

130

61%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

119

56%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

169

54%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

59

77%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

118

55%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

182

55%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

44

86%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

46

79%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

42

55%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

143

60%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

186

60%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

16

5%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.