500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHUYLERVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

167

45%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

89

49%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

59

48%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

155

44%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

103

45%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

56

16%

LEVEL 2

162

47%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

106

46%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

15

75%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

164

44%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

131

47%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

31

46%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.