500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHUYLERVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

101

25%

LEVEL 2

169

42%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

88

43%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

166

44%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

25

86%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

23

85%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

98

24%

LEVEL 2

167

42%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

43

43%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

46

52%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.