500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

162

41%

LEVEL 4

119

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

138

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

88

40%

LEVEL 4

70

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

58

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

30

41%

LEVEL 4

37

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

40

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

22

45%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

168
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

62

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

186
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

116

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

135

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

272
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

79

22%

LEVEL 3

155

43%

LEVEL 4

117

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

275
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

136

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

23

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

27

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

96

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

111

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

268
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

115

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.