500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

121

40%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

48

42%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

28

43%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

62

46%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

86

45%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

79

43%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

87

45%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

17

81%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.