500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SALMON RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

141

51%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

138

51%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

48

41%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

53

42%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

93

59%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

85

58%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

97

54%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

88

51%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

38

47%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

45

52%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

106

46%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

33

52%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

115

56%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

135

50%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

135

51%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

61
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

135

51%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.