500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SALMON RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

133

45%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

68

47%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

66

52%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

86

59%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

94

55%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

99

52%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

87

46%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

44

48%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

41

42%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

97

39%

LEVEL 2

105

43%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

100

39%

LEVEL 2

110

43%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

36

78%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

31

48%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

23

30%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

120

52%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

109

49%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.