500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 2 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

163

68%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

208

67%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

74

67%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

98

68%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

89

68%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

110

66%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

142
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

93

62%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

188
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

124

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

65

76%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

77

74%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

147

72%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

12

4%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

200

72%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

223
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

157

68%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

203

67%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

51

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

87

76%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

112

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

121

62%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.