500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 2 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

117

49%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

167

54%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

61

55%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

72

50%

LEVEL 4

43

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

49

38%

LEVEL 3

56

43%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

95

58%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

62

42%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

152
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

105

53%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

53

62%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

58

56%

LEVEL 4

28

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

98

48%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

153

56%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

19

54%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

17

49%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

113

49%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

58

19%

LEVEL 3

163

54%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

35

46%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

62

54%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

82

50%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

105

54%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.