500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 1 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

168

73%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

244

83%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

86

77%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

115

81%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

82

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

129

84%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

127
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

99

75%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

162
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

127

78%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

64

72%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

118
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

106

89%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

157

75%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

227

85%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

17

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

35

78%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

48

81%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

133

72%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

196

83%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.