500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 5 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

166

69%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

25

8%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

209

66%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

89

74%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

111

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

77

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

98

64%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

150
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

108

68%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

195
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

8%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

134

62%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

50

69%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

66

72%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

148

74%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

191

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

18

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

28

45%

LEVEL 4

18

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

162

69%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

286
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

24

8%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

207

66%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

40

74%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

62

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

126

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

147

66%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.