500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

INWOOD ACAD FOR LEADERSHIP CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

163

37%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

93

39%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

153

37%

LEVEL 2

172

41%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

138
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

148

44%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

64

64%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

64

64%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

156

42%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

47

63%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

36

48%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

144

40%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

130

32%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.