500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

INWOOD ACAD FOR LEADERSHIP CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

121

27%

LEVEL 2

150

34%

LEVEL 3

127

28%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

128

30%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

84

34%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

160
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

113

27%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

140
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

117

34%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

61

60%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

66

59%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

86

24%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

45

61%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

42

61%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

116

28%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

122

31%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

108

27%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

13

32%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.