500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

INWOOD ACAD FOR LEADERSHIP CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

159

48%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

207

47%

LEVEL 2

183

41%

LEVEL 3

42

10%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

110

47%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

85

56%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

121

58%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

147

49%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

192

48%

LEVEL 2

168

42%

LEVEL 3

37

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

141

40%

LEVEL 2

165

46%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

51

76%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

66

77%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

112

41%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

150

40%

LEVEL 2

170

46%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

47

84%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

57

80%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

36

43%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

148

49%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

171

48%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.