500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOOL OF INQUIRY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

132

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

8%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

220

70%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

69

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

107

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

63

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

113

77%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

22

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

50

86%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

101

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

151

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

11

65%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

107

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

181

72%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

25

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

39

64%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.