500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

157

52%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

175

54%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

68

48%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

68

49%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

89

55%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

107

57%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

32

57%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

32

59%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

104

52%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

130

56%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

93

41%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

117

49%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

64

83%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

58

68%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

124

48%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

142

51%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

33

72%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

17

39%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

22

47%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

140

54%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

153

55%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

137

52%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

157

55%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

20

47%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.