500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

114

37%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

136

43%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

93

51%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

27

43%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

25

44%

LEVEL 2

21

37%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

68

34%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

99

45%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

53

64%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

62

74%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

29

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

26

84%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

121

45%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.