500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUNDVIEW ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

104

29%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

121

34%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

58

46%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

38

34%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

36

43%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

133

40%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

30

46%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

90

32%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

104

33%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

17

41%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.