500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

UNCOMMON EXCELLENCE GIRLS CS NYC GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

187

45%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

28

5%

LEVEL 2

149

29%

LEVEL 3

202

39%

LEVEL 4

133

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

8

67%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

230
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

100

28%

LEVEL 3

152

43%

LEVEL 4

78

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

285
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

173

40%

LEVEL 4

112

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

22

59%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

21

47%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

178

47%

LEVEL 4

88

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

133

28%

LEVEL 3

190

41%

LEVEL 4

125

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

18

51%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

46

52%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

40

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

141

43%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

155

40%

LEVEL 4

93

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.