500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

UNCOMMON EXCELLENCE GIRLS CS NYC GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

104

44%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

137

43%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

111
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

90

43%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

150
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

98

46%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

132

45%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

12

48%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

34

53%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

38

44%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

70

40%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.