500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

UNCOMMON BROWNSVILLE NORTH CS NYC GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

171

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

69

16%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

201

48%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

94

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

103

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

77

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

98

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

9

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

215
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

147

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

274
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

61

17%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

163

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

14

45%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

25

54%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

35

12%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

163

56%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

50

13%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

192

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

28

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

28

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

143

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

56

16%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

173

49%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.