500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MARSH AVE SCH FOR EXPEDITIONARY LRN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

174

40%

LEVEL 3

129

29%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

25

50%

LEVEL 4

13

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

17

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

21

26%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

36

51%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

135

39%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

49

53%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

33

42%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.