500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 4 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

197

56%

LEVEL 4

86

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

65

18%

LEVEL 3

191

53%

LEVEL 4

102

28%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

94

54%

LEVEL 4

50

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

86

50%

LEVEL 4

58

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

103

58%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

105

55%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

193
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

52

21%

LEVEL 3

135

55%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

210
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

139

56%

LEVEL 4

71

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

51

60%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

45

51%

LEVEL 4

27

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

162

57%

LEVEL 4

81

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

148

56%

LEVEL 4

91

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

35

51%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

54
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

43

44%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

275
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

190

55%

LEVEL 4

85

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

287
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

186

53%

LEVEL 4

101

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

88%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

60

48%

LEVEL 4

47

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

53

49%

LEVEL 4

39

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

137

60%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

138

55%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.