500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 2 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

41

10%

LEVEL 3

125

29%

LEVEL 4

261

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

437
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

24

5%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

304

66%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

206
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

146

65%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

234
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

170

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

115

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

203
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

134

63%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

285
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

193

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

295
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

202

64%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

56

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

86

68%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

7%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

240

66%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

259

69%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

78
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

45

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

52

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

70

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

303
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

32

9%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

209

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

326
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

234

67%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.