500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 2 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

173

44%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

76

18%

LEVEL 3

233

54%

LEVEL 4

112

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

87

43%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

28

12%

LEVEL 3

137

61%

LEVEL 4

60

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

86

45%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

96

47%

LEVEL 4

52

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

188
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

127

43%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

261
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

176

55%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

38

47%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

50

53%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

160

46%

LEVEL 4

73

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

48

13%

LEVEL 3

208

57%

LEVEL 4

107

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

23

49%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

28

45%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

248
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

172

44%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

39

48%

LEVEL 4

19

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

47

51%

LEVEL 4

26

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

134

43%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

186

55%

LEVEL 4

86

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.