500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS - HARLEM 3 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

498
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

36

7%

LEVEL 3

144

27%

LEVEL 4

354

66%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

30

6%

LEVEL 3

114

23%

LEVEL 4

347

70%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

260
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

191

68%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

240
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

180

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

238
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

163

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

221
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

167

70%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

322
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

229

66%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

290
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

223

72%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

154
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

108

65%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

149
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

110

69%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

453
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

24

5%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

334

70%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

404
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

316

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

57
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

31

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

455
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

29

6%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

342

70%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

82

70%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

140

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

388
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

29

7%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

272

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

207

71%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.