500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

COLUMBIA SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

121

68%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

123

75%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

75

75%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

69

78%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

46

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

54

73%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

11

85%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

11

92%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

12

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

38

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

42

89%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

25

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

17

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

42

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

41

69%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

120

76%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

122

80%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

73

85%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

79

89%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

48

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

44

59%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

114

70%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

118

78%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.