500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

COLUMBIA SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

100

56%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

121

68%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

58

62%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

75

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

42

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

46

60%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

9

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

11

92%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

25

86%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

38

90%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

22

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

25

51%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

35

49%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

42

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

99

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

120

76%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

54

68%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

73

85%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

46

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

48

53%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.