500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

COLUMBIA SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

116

41%

LEVEL 4

99

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

107

39%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

57

41%

LEVEL 4

54

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

54

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

45

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

53

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

32

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

36

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

26

39%

LEVEL 4

21

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

68

51%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

48

42%

LEVEL 4

31

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

107

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

56

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

63

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

85

48%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

65

44%

LEVEL 4

44

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.