500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ROCHESTER PREP CS 1 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

186

39%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

81

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

102

43%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

85

42%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

197
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

141

32%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

176
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

143

37%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

28

33%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

136

34%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.