500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

UNCOMMON BED-STUY WEST CS NYC GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

134

34%

LEVEL 4

123

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

142

35%

LEVEL 4

154

37%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

74

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

85

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

225
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

104

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

252
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

128

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

13

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

122

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

151

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

13

34%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

39

46%

LEVEL 4

26

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

38

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

97

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

116

36%

LEVEL 4

116

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.