500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOLARS' ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

31

7%

LEVEL 3

116

26%

LEVEL 4

299

66%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

32

8%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

291

69%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

247
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

182

70%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

213
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

170

72%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

117

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

121

66%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

109
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

98

88%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

102
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

95

91%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

112

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

104

62%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

23

42%

LEVEL 4

27

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

37

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

53

62%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

49

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

3%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

291

71%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

358
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

5%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

285

76%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

151

64%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

159

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

148

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

132

70%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

411
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

296

66%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.