500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOLARS' ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

599
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

99

14%

LEVEL 3

282

40%

LEVEL 4

317

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

682
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 785

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

102

13%

LEVEL 3

366

47%

LEVEL 4

316

40%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

347
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

49

12%

LEVEL 3

157

40%

LEVEL 4

190

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

396
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

50

11%

LEVEL 3

191

43%

LEVEL 4

205

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

252
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

125

41%

LEVEL 4

127

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

286
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

52

15%

LEVEL 3

175

52%

LEVEL 4

111

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

161
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

97

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

181
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

89

46%

LEVEL 4

92

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

111

41%

LEVEL 4

122

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

135

44%

LEVEL 4

128

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

95
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

44

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

53

47%

LEVEL 4

50

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

65

45%

LEVEL 4

60

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

596
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

96

14%

LEVEL 3

281

41%

LEVEL 4

315

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

674
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

100

13%

LEVEL 3

361

47%

LEVEL 4

313

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

128

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

326
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

47

13%

LEVEL 3

170

46%

LEVEL 4

156

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

359
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

68

16%

LEVEL 3

170

40%

LEVEL 4

189

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

356
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

55

13%

LEVEL 3

196

48%

LEVEL 4

160

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.