500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FANNIE LOU HAMER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

183

70%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

137

53%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

97

72%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

66

52%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

86

67%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

71

53%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

41

68%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

41

64%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

137

71%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

89

48%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

134

64%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

99

47%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

49

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

38

81%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

138

65%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

45

88%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

17

41%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

158

68%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

120

55%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

140

70%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

102

51%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

43

67%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.