500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

COMP MODEL SCH PROJECT MS 327 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

157

51%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

72

24%

LEVEL 2

138

46%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

81

52%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

75

44%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

76

51%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

63

47%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

18

29%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

115

50%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

108

46%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

139

57%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

119

48%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

39

64%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

31

58%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

142

53%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

127

48%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

153

52%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

128

46%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.