500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CONSELYEA PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

40

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

34

36%

LEVEL 4

36

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

64

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

36

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

45

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.