500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY & SOCIAL JUSTICE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

112

23%

LEVEL 2

166

34%

LEVEL 3

130

26%

LEVEL 4

83

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

101

22%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

96

21%

LEVEL 4

126

27%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

146
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

154
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

92

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

123

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

53

49%

LEVEL 2

44

40%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

51

48%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

207
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

125

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

33

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

93

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.