500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

RANDOLPH HOLDER-SOCIAL JUSTICE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

95

35%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

122

43%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

47

34%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

63

51%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

38

39%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

48

51%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

66

40%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

42

54%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

57

70%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

85

39%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

37

59%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

83

35%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

97

43%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

25

47%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.