500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL II GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

129

42%

LEVEL 4

82

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

100

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

60

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

69

47%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

40

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

12

55%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

33

42%

LEVEL 4

31

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

30

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

36

46%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

23

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

42

39%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

121

45%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

93

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

129

43%

LEVEL 4

82

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

100

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

68

42%

LEVEL 4

59

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

58

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

61

43%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.