500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ISAAC NEWTON MS-MATH & SCIENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

21

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

24

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

13

32%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

46

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.