500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SEQUOYA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

152

36%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

23

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

20

20%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

150

40%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

130

36%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.