500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SEQUOYA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

100

18%

LEVEL 2

226

40%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

83

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

58

48%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

66

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

20

48%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

205

41%

LEVEL 3

149

30%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

23

77%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

82

17%

LEVEL 2

193

40%

LEVEL 3

132

27%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.