500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WESTMINSTER COMMUNITY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

196

59%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

146

44%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

103

57%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

73

42%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

93

62%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

73

46%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

194

61%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

172

57%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

122

40%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

24

80%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

188

62%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

138

47%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.